English → Arabic transcript

the efficacy of a therapeutic. And so the rule goes, the Coy scale is based on the supposition that the more attacked a therapeutic is by media journals, the agencies, the institutions, the more denigration and ridicule that a therapy receives, the more effective it is. And then I came

up with like, points for like, you know, hit job in like a stupid article in the media, you know, Fauci going out on television, someone losing their license, you know, for prescribing it, you know, all the kind of things they did against people using ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine. But with

chlorine dioxide, it gets pretty up there. I mean, the history of chlorine dioxide involves assassinations, people dying, you know, who are involved in it. And so it's, that gets real dark. But here's another interesting, really another interesting chapter that I learned about chlorine dioxide.

So I was introduced to a source who was what's called an applied scientist. He's now in his 80s. But during the 80s and 90s, he worked with intelligence. I can't say that he worked for but he was adjacent. And one of his specialists specialties was helping prominent scientists defect from other countries,

particularly Soviet Union. And one of the scientists who he helped defect was a guy named Vladimir Pasechnik. Now, Pasechnik was the head of the Russian bioweapons program. This tells you how deep and how old this goes. And the source that I talked with had a long experience with chlorine dioxide from like

the 50s and 60s. He'd also done research in it. But when he met Pasechnik, and they developed a relationship, Pasechnik let him know this is the 80s, that they had been doing research with chlorine dioxide, they had been curing TB with it, that's number one. And he said to my source, that chlorine dioxide is the

ultimate antidote to all bioweapons. This is in the 80s. And so when you ask like, why do they pull everything off of Amazon, that gives you a little bit of, you know, context for why they would go preemptively after something that would, I would guess out of everything we used in COVID would probably be

number one in terms of its efficacy. Yeah, which is crazy, too. Because you know, obviously, it's like when you're when you're dealing with like gain of function research and all the different kinds of like bioweapon type stuff that's being developed. I mean, you

who like we all know, okay, COVID definitely, there's some shenanigans going on there. But But who knows how many other things have been happening that we've been exposed to and all that where it's like, okay, we should probably stock up on this stuff a little bit and just just just to be safe. And I think I

think as well, it's really interesting, because, you know, I can't tell you how many how many times it's like things that I know are safe and effective, whether you're talking about this or ivermectin, or even like changes in diet or whatever, like doctors in the medical