Discussion on Palestinian Narrative and Nakba

The Palestinian narrative is based,

of course, on lies, and I,

can, of course, prove it. Hi, my name is Ezra Mor, and this is

the Palestinian community in the Netherlands,

which is no different from any other

bunch of keffiyeh-wearing freaks and fatties.

And this week, to mark the ongoing

three- year genocide and

the Nakba, now in its seventy- eighth year,

this Dutch drug den

announced a sit- in strike

that will take place,

of course, on October 7.

And that's no surprise, since so many

events supporting Palestinian terrorists around the world

are scheduled for October 7.

Because, by stealing this

date and declaring October 7

Genocide Day,

left- liberal parasites hope to make

everyone forget about the attack

Hamas terrorists' attack

on Israel on October 7,

that is, the root cause

of the war in the Gaza Strip.

And then the myth of a genocide that

began spontaneously and without cause

will take root in history, just like the myth of that

very Nakba, which supposedly has

been going on for seventy- eight

years, and which

I actually wanted to talk about in the first place.

After all, thanks to exactly

the same distortion of history

that the Palestinian community in the Netherlands

is trying to pull off right now, over the past

seventy- eight years,

the myth of the Nakba was formed

in exactly the same way, as

some mythical expulsion of

some mythical Arabs from their

mythical homes, which is absolute nonsense.

But to establish that, you and I need to find out when,

by whom exactly, and in

what context the word Nakba was first used, and what it

It means. And can you imagine, it’s all known to you and me.

Meet the Syrian historian and intellectual, one of

the ideologues of Arab nationalism,

Constantine Zureiq, who in

August 1948, that is, while the war for

Israel’s independence was at its height,

while in Lebanon’s capital,

the city of Beirut,

publishes a pamphlet that is literally

called “The Meaning of the Nakba,” or,

translated from Arabic, “The Meaning

of the Catastrophe,”

in which the Syrian historian Constantine

Zureiq, for the first time in

history, uses the word Nakba

in reference to Israel.

And now for the funniest part:

Constantine Zureiq said nothing

about Palestinian refugees, nothing

about the expulsion of the poor

Arabs from their homes, and nothing

about Zionist colonialism.

None of that was even remotely

what Constantine Zureiq

was talking about when describing the Nakba.

Actually, using this word solely to

describe

the defeat of the Arab states

in the 1948 war and their

inability to prevent

the creation of Israel,

while specifically

emphasizing that this was not a

temporary Naksa setback, but a

true Nakba catastrophe for

the entire Arab people,

stemming from internal weakness,

division, and

the Arabs’ backwardness compared to the Jews.

The word Nakba never meant the

expulsion of Arabs or ethnic

cleansing. It meant Arab

ineptitude, which, through

the distortion of history,

was turned into a myth of the

suffering of the Palestinian

people. And now they’re trying to do the same thing

with the date of October 7.

Whether they succeed or not depends only on us.

All the best.