Discussion on Quranic Interpretations and Hadith

The Qur’an says that Abu Bakr and Umar drove someone out of a house.

And they said that if the Qur’an mentions Abu Jahl and mentions him, people like al- Rabi‘a and people like al- Rabi‘a.

And they insulted him, and Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman al-Mughira ibn Shu‘ba, and Abu Musa al-Ash‘ari, and Salim, the freedman of Abu Hudhayfa, the hypocrites and the Nasibis.

And they are humiliated. They drove her away, leaving nothing but a great commotion.

They vilify the Prophet when his uncle… They defended them, all of them, by name.

But they are fabricators. And it is not in the Two Sahihs.

And in the Musnad of Ahmad ibn Hanbal are many hadiths.

Even Umar ibn al- Khattab said, “Two verses from the Book of God…”

“Were it not for people saying, ‘Umar added to the Book of God,’ I would have added them.”

Ah, from the Book of God People left it. Were it not for people saying, ‘Umar added to the Book of God,’ I would have added them.

“The old man and the old woman, if they commit adultery, stone them.”

Umar’s hadith exists, and Aisha’s hadith about breastfeeding.

He said, “Ten feedings.” She said, “If it is in the Qur’an…”

So- and- so, I don’t know who stopped her from completing the recitation.

The strange chicken. He narrated it. And Umar, may God be pleased with him.

No, no. They drove her away.

There is some nuance in Umar’s words. Why does he justify it?

The words of al- Hadi, peace be upon him, on rulings.

Al-Hadi went on at length about the legitimacy of stoning.

This suggests that the tribe practicing stoning was uneasy about it.

There were people who opposed stoning. They said, “It isn’t sanctioned. It’s not in the Quran.”

So Al- Hadi went on at length about the rulings on the legitimacy of stoning.

He looked into it and inferred its legitimacy from the Quran.